Skip to main content
    Zurvek
    Back to research
    Research · Process

    How much diligence is enough? Depth by cheque size

    Over-diligence on a small cheque burns the relationship and the calendar. Under-diligence on a large one is how funds acquire problems they cannot unwind. The work should be proportionate to the money at risk and to the evidence the company can actually produce.

    In short

    Angel cheques warrant days of work: founders, a live product, the cap table and the bank balance. Seed warrants two to four weeks across all seven pillars at document depth. Series A warrants four to eight weeks with retention reconciled to invoices and external counsel engaged. Series B and later warrants audited statements and confirmatory legal work. Anything beyond the band you are in is usually theatre.

    Angel cheque

    Days, not weeks
    Proportionate
    • Founder background and two references outside the prepared list
    • A working product seen live, not in a recorded demo
    • Cap table and instrument read once, properly
    • Bank balance and current burn
    Usually theatre at this size
    • Commissioned market studies
    • External technical audits of a pre-revenue product
    • Formal quality-of-earnings work on a company with no earnings

    Seed round

    Two to four weeks
    Proportionate
    • The full seven pillars at document depth, worked once
    • Bottom-up market rebuild from the company's own inputs
    • Early cohort behaviour where any usage history exists
    • Corporate filings, IP assignments and statutory dues checked
    • Three to five customer or user conversations
    Usually theatre at this size
    • Multi-week legal confirmatory processes before a term sheet
    • Penetration testing a product with a handful of customers
    • Precision forecasting beyond the next eighteen months

    Series A

    Four to eight weeks
    Proportionate
    • Cohort retention reconciled to invoices and bank credits
    • Unit economics recomputed independently, not accepted
    • Architecture, security posture and dependency mapping reviewed
    • External counsel on contracts, change-of-control and prior rounds
    • Five to ten references including churned customers
    • Concentration and renewal analysis on the top accounts
    Usually theatre at this size
    • Re-running seed-stage founder checks that have not changed
    • Full audit-grade financial work before the deal is otherwise agreed
    • Diligence that continues after every open question is answered

    Series B and later

    Six to twelve weeks
    Proportionate
    • Audited statements and quality-of-earnings work
    • External technical review and compliance certification
    • Net revenue retention and pricing power tested at depth
    • Full confirmatory legal, litigation, tax and insurance review
    • Management depth, succession and governance structure
    Usually theatre at this size
    • Treating a growth company's diligence as a longer seed process
    • Reference volume as a substitute for revenue quality work

    What this framing does not settle

    Cheque size is a starting point, not a rule. A small cheque into a regulated lender deserves more legal work than a large one into a pre-revenue tools company; a fund's own concentration, reserve strategy and reputation exposure move the line too. The bands above set the default; the deal moves it.

    The item-level detail sits in the 99-point checklist. For India-registered targets, add the India evidence layer, and see how the findings get written up in the memo teardown.

    Right-size the work

    Get the document-depth pass done before you commit calendar time

    Run the deck and supporting files through the adversarial passes first, then spend your own hours on the questions it surfaces.

    Five adversarial passes

    Velocity, reconciliation, defensibility, red team, and governor — each reads the same evidence separately.

    A committee brief

    Verdict, scores, and the reasoning behind each, written for an investment committee rather than a dashboard.

    Contradictions listed

    Where the deck disagrees with itself or with the supporting documents, quoted rather than summarised.

    A locked integrity record

    The output is fingerprinted and time-locked, so the version the committee read can be re-checked later.

    5 evaluations are free, no card required. Zurvek is a decision-support system — verdicts are analytical, not advisory.

    How this is used by VC firms, family offices, NBFCs, and angel investors.