Submit the evidence. Receive structured findings, visible gaps, company-specific questions, a committee-ready memo, and a traceable decision record.
Decks accepted from any country. India registry prompts (MCA21, GST, SEBI/RBI) apply to India-incorporated companies only.
The method keeps assumptions, missing evidence and later outcomes visibly separate.
Adversarial review
Five adversarial roles examine the evidence in one structured debate.
Zero inference
Missing data is reported as missing. Gaps are never filled with assumptions.
Immutable verdict
Every verdict is time-stamped and hashed, so it can be re-read exactly as issued.
Outcome comparison · Planned
Planned outcome records will compare later observations with the immutable original verdict.
Five adversarial roles interrogate the same evidence from different structural angles.
Swipe the evidence lenses
01 / 10
Risk dimension
Founder-market misfit, key-person dependency, co-founder conflict, leadership gaps
Key-person dependency can concentrate execution risk in a single founder.
Solo non-technical founder building a deep-tech product
3 co-founders with identical skill sets, no commercial lead
CTO left 2 months before fundraise, not disclosed
Risk dimension
TAM inflation, adoption friction, timing mismatch, competitive saturation
Top-down market sizing can obscure the realistically addressable segment.
Claiming $50B TAM but addressable segment is $200M
Product requires behavior change in a regulated industry
5 well-funded competitors launched in the last 12 months
Risk dimension
Technical debt, build-vs-buy fragility, no defensible IP, scalability ceilings
Outsourced core logic and unclear ownership can constrain defensibility.
Entire product is an API wrapper with no proprietary layer
Single-server architecture with no horizontal scaling path
Core algorithm uses open-source models with no fine-tuning
Risk dimension
Burn rate unsustainability, revenue-expense contradiction, margin erosion
Revenue inconsistencies are surfaced for evidence-led verification.
Burning $180K/month with $90K MRR and 4 months runway
Revenue grew 3x but losses grew 5x in the same period
Customer acquisition cost exceeds lifetime value by 2.4x
Risk dimension
Overvaluation vs. sector benchmarks, dilution vulnerability, cap table red flags
Valuation assumptions are tested against the evidence supplied in the deal materials.
Pre-revenue startup seeking $25M valuation in a down market
40% of equity allocated to non-contributing advisors
Previous round priced higher than current ask, down round signal
Risk dimension
Delivery compression, hiring bottlenecks, go-to-market failure patterns
Delivery commitments can expose hiring, capital and sequencing constraints.
12-month product roadmap with 3 engineers and no DevOps
Enterprise GTM strategy but zero sales hires on the team
Launched 18 months ago with 4 pivots and no retained users
Risk dimension
Regulatory exposure, IP ownership gaps, pending litigation signals
Undisclosed IP assignment gaps trigger automatic compliance flags.
IP developed during founders' previous employment, unresolved
Operating in fintech with no regulatory license or counsel
Sector-specific data processing with no compliance plan
Risk dimension
No viable acquirer landscape, IPO readiness gaps, liquidity timeline mismatch
An unsupported liquidity pathway is recorded as an unresolved evidence gap.
Niche vertical with zero M&A activity in last 5 years
Fund expects 3-year exit but sector average is 8+ years
No strategic acquirer alignment, purely financial exit hope
Risk dimension
Confirmation bias in due diligence, halo effect, anchoring on vanity metrics
Anchoring, halo effects and confirmation bias can distort committee discussion.
Lead partner anchored on founder's previous exit, ignoring current metrics
Team uses 'downloads' as traction metric, zero revenue correlation
FOMO-driven urgency: 'round closing in 48 hours' pressure tactic
Risk dimension
Geopolitical sensitivity, supply chain fragility, ESG compliance gaps
Unstated geographic dependencies are surfaced as structural exposure.
Single-source hardware dependency from geopolitically unstable region
Carbon-intensive operations with no ESG reporting framework
Cross-border data flows with no regional privacy controls
Follow a source-page claim through its evidence status, assessment effect, reviewer question, committee memo, and sealed integrity record.
Inspect the sample evaluationClaim · page 04
Revenue growth is consistent with uploaded financials (not independently verified).
Reviewer question
Provide dated invoices or bank receipts for reported recurring revenue.
Integrity record
Sealed · re-verifiable against the issued hash.
■ Built for every institutional mandate
One decision infrastructure layer, adapted to each evaluation mandate.
Vault applies the standard Zurvek evaluation pipeline to private portfolio documents, then preserves the resulting evidence lineage for committee review.
Private PDF and spreadsheet evidence is read through five adversarial roles in one structured debate.
Every completed run keeps its recorded conclusion, evidence fingerprint, and prior-run relationship.
New evidence creates a new evaluation. Earlier records remain intact for committee comparison.
Illustrative evidence brief
One record. Three structural lenses.
Financial integrity
62
Recorded from source evidence
Technical viability
71
Structural signal, not a forecast
Commercial potential
54
Adoption friction remains visible
Periodically refreshed conflict signals. Hover a hotspot to trace structural exposure.
Synthesized by Zurvek Engine· Not editorial. Not advisory.
CENTRA
What should we examine today?
Decision support, not advice · Demo answer
On public pages, CENTRA helps identify the right Zurvek workflow. After sign-in, it reads the current page, account and recorded evidence in context.
Fund screening, cohort review, founder readiness or underwriting support — CENTRA maps the relevant path.
How Zurvek turns evidence into structured evaluation, committee questions and an auditable record.
One relevant route based on your mandate, without turning the conversation into a sales script.
We review 300 accelerator applications. Where does Zurvek fit?
Use batch intake for a consistent first pass, cohort-relative ranking and reviewer assignment. Escalate finalists into five adversarial roles in one structured debate and preserve the reason behind each selection decision.
CENTRA asks for confirmation before starting an evaluation. It cannot change a plan or send anything.
SECTION // EVIDENCE OUTPUT
SYSTEM REFERENCE · SEALED RECORD
The issued record remains re-verifiable against the issued hash.
HASH-LOCKED VERDICT RECORD
Downloadable on Syndicate tier and above
Planned outcome records will compare user-entered observations with the original sealed verdict without rewriting the prior record.
HOW IT WORKS: Every verdict is cryptographically hash-locked and timestamped at issue, so it can be re-verified exactly as issued. Any later edit to the underlying evaluation breaks the hash. A downloadable Verdict Integrity Certificate records that hash, the timestamp and the claims audit for each evaluation.
Decision support is useful only when its limits remain visible.
If you want comfort or automatic agreement, Zurvek is the wrong tool. The evaluation tests what the submitted evidence supports.
Signals describe documented support, unresolved friction and structural constraints. They do not forecast returns or guarantee outcomes.
Zurvek creates a structured evidence record, explicit blind spots and company-specific questions before discussion.
Five free evaluations · No credit card
First contact with adversarial intelligence.
Active deal flow. Individual investor or solo GP.
Deal leads, GPs, small fund committees.
Custom institutional access and volume terms.
Custom allowance and fair-use terms are agreed in the contract.
The same adversarial engine investors use, turned on your own deck before they see it.
Planned features are listed on the Roadmap, not here.
What the engine does, what it records, and what it leaves to your committee.
The market has data.
It does not have judgment.
5 evaluations free · No credit card
